Search This Blog

Friday, October 21, 2016

Loyalty to Losers

So last night was that Al Smith Memorial Dinner which we talked about yesterday; the one where the wealthy and powerful gather together in a white-tie affair under the pretense of raising money for the poor children of NYC

Of course had all the people in attendance contributed $10,000 each which is a drop in the bucket to each of them and 1/25th of the cost to attend a Hillary for Prez $250k a plate affair, the charity would have raised $10mil which would have been $4mil more than the total they were all gushing proudly about..

But anyways..
We ended up watching part of it.. the part where Trump went viciously after Hillary

And we say 'viciously' in a very complimentary way

One truthful zinger after another while the deeply phony, soulless bitch smiled and smiled and members of the pro-Hillary audience booed and jeered..

No man-hating closet-lesbian will ever allow someone like Trump to bother Her publicly
Toward the end of the speech when Trump was complimentary toward the Catholic charity for all the work they do to help the underprivileged, he mentioned the need to respect and value the sanctity of life

And of course Hillary representing all those valueless Democrats and who herself has had a few abortions of her own for convenience would not clap in response to acknowledge the truth of that statement

From  Mar 29, 2016:

"In an interview with the American Mirror, Sally Miller — who claims she was a mistress of former President Bill Clinton — alleges that Hillary had “several abortions” and only decided to keep Chelsea after Bill convinced her it would benefit their political careers.

“She had several abortions before she had Chelsea, and it was only because Bill convinced her that if they were ever to move up in politics, they had to have a child, because that’s what the political analysts had said,” Miller explained. “They’ve got to see her [Hillary] as a human.”"
Well not sure if that 'human' thing is really all that convincing but Hillary did get a devoted daughter out of the political tradeoff and that's a good thing..
Meanwhile Wikileaks keeps releasing batches and batches of emails and the public either does not care, does not understand or does not wish to spend the time and energy to read them

Julian Assange expresses frustration at the US election but it is we who express frustration at Him!

The sheer arrogance of holding onto all this information for months and then releasing as an October 'surprise' so he can get the most attention -- pure ego

This should have been released during the Democrat primaries when it would have had the greatest impact
Right now liberal voters are dug in snug because like soldiers with no individuality locked to a lost cause, Pavlovian dog Democrats are as blindly loyal to their party..

However had all these emails come out in detail back in the spring, the Democrat voters would have given Bernie Sanders greater support, or alternate candidates with ethics and morals would have stepped in to run and replace Hilly as the nominee

It is same mindset when it comes to politics and voting, you see in support for local sports teams

Such blind, unconditional loyalty to the local teams no matter how bad they are or how unwilling owners are to improve the product or how much tickets and parking are raised
It just shows that even in a democracy, people have pack mentalities like wolves and need to be associated of groups and display the colors & logos so they can be part of a majority rather than think for themselves.

It is something we witness all the time in our present location..

We have a local NBA team that won 10 games last season out of 82 and yet attendance still averaged over 14,000 people per home game because of loyalty to losers; the local NHL team that has not won in 31 years enjoys similar loyalty
We have a local MLB team that won 71 games out of 162 played while cutting payroll and receiving the first $200mil installment of a 25yr, $5billion TV deal and Yet attendance was nearly 2 million as people sat out in the hot, sticky sun to watch continual failure.. all because of loyalty to losers..

We have an NFL team that has not won a Championship of any kind in 56 years and still every home game is sold out with a long waiting list for season tickets all due to loyalty to losers

So we know what it looks like.

And millions and millions of Democrat voters will hold their noses and vote Hillary because they can not imagine thinking outside the box and selecting anyone not in their Party..
Former NBA great and TNT anaylst Charles Barkley was recently asked on the Clinton News Network (CNN) who he'd vote for in November..  

He said he's a lifelong Democrat (which is odd considering he always teased he would one day run for Governor of Alabama as a Republican) and said he had a very hard time voting for Hillary because of her corruption, deciet, etc. But if he did vote, it would be for her or not vote at all...

~ rolls eyes ~

Loyalty to losers folks.. Loyalty to losers

Thursday, October 20, 2016

Distorted Polls and Phony Frivolity

~ Hillary in 1969 looking as unattractive and non-feminine as a woman can possibly be

We didn't watch the third Presidential debate last night..

Just didn't see the point..

Every factual argument Trump would make would get ignored by the media and every little flub or blunder would be magnified and mocked..

We did hear from other sources afterward that the media and those rotten Democrats made a big deal over the fact that Trump did not rule out the possibility of contesting the election if he lost..
~ LBJ speaking at the Al Smith Memorial Dinner in 1964; Hubert Humphrey is sitting bottom left

They tried to paint him as a sore loser among other negatives..

Funny as we recall back on election night 2000, assholes like Dan Rather declaring that Florida was won by Al Gore making him President over George W. Bush

And then the Bush team challenged..  The worthless liberal media did not like him doing that and made a big stink every step of the way

And a month or so later Bush was correctly made winner of the state making Him the President, not Gore

So there's successful precedent
~ LBJ applauding Nixon at Dinner in 1968 while Vietnam raged 

Now if you believe some of the polls out there and support Trump, you might begin to feel hopeless and not want to take the time to vote..

Which of course is the goal of the media and the pollsters putting out those distorted figures..

You see, around the Rep convention, Trump was showing he had a 5-6% lead on Hillary, and then it was decided by these liberal fucks that too many white men were polled and that skewed the results because to them it just was not 'realistic' that so many Caucasians would vote

So they started doubling up on blacks, Hispanics and other traditional Democrat groups and suddenly Trump was down and that's been the storyline for months
~ Carter & Reagan sharing smiles in 1980 as the hostages in Iran suffered

Rasmussen is probably one of the more honest polling outlets..

If you go on their website (article link below), they report that after last night's final debate, Trump has a 3 point lead over Hillary nationally.

LA Times says he still holds a 1% lead..

You would never know this if you get your news from most mainstream media.. Instead you would think he was down by 7-10 points
~ Sickening sight of Bush & Gore showing they like each other (2000)

So if you support Trump, do not feel at all discouraged.. Just continue supporting him as you would normally and don't let anyone dissuade you from voting

Overall we like many of you are very tired of this whole election..  It just seems to drag on and on when 96% of those who will bother to vote, already have made up their minds

If there is one specific day in a Presidential election cycle we absolute HATE more than any other, it is today, or rather this evening

Tonight will be the Al Smith Memorial Foundation Dinner

Now the reasoning for the Dinner we support - a means to raise money to help the poor, sick and underprivileged children in New York City
~ Warm smiles in 2008 as McCain & Obama acknowledge they work on the same team for the same people i.e. those in attendance..

What we hate is that it is a swanky white-tie dinner where the most wealthy and powerful get together to share laughs and bask in the glow of their superiority over the rest of the country..

It is also where you see the two candidates for President swap stories, tell jokes and show everyone what a complete farce elections are in terms of there being really no differences in the political parties.

I remember watching it on YouTube back in 2008 about one month after the stock market collapsed and Lehman went under..  There was Obama and McCain sharing smiles, chuckles and witty self-deprecating zingers as if best of friends and the nation was doing just fine while the 1% financial class laughed n' laughed
~ So a Colored man, a Cardinal and a Mormon enter a bar...

It bothered me as much in 2012 seeing Mitt Romney sit up on the stage with Obama, just yukking it up while the economy was in complete standstill and knowing there were people out there who lost their jobs and homes and living in their cars or on the street due to the crash and Obama's refusal to help them

And who can forget Romney's asshole remark in 2012 that he was only interested in bettering the lives of 47% of the nation

So tonight, a mere 24 hours after the last debate, this rotten, corrupt lying cunt woman will be sharing funny anecdotes and other phone frivolity with the man she really would rather scratch into a million pieces with her nails
~ Hillary and Trump at 30yrs old..

And Trump.. Its hard to tell about him..  He seems like he has Hillary sized up pretty well and yet on numerous occasions, he and the Trump family donated to Hillary's elections for Senator and supported the bitch in 2008 when she ran for President

It all makes a sincere person sick to their stomach

Keyword 'Al Smith Memorial Dinner' on YouTube and you will see how ridiculous and pompous the whole affair is (if you do so on Fri 10/21 or afterward and you can watch Trump and Hillary as well as past events)
~ Bill Clinton looks very happy to have a daughter as he holds Chelsea; Hillary doesn't look all that thrilled..

We support Trump and will continue to do so..

But we loyally support his candidacy because we care far more about the betterment of the nation & everyday people's lives and are voting for the positive change we hope he will bring to the nation

And that's as far as our support goes.

Wednesday, October 19, 2016

More Podesta Emails on Hillary & a 'Confidential' sent to Obama on AIG

~ Such an ugly puss..

Yesterday, a bus carrying a bunch of shitty people who are working tirelessly so a corrupt, closet-lesbian piece of shit can run the country was caught literally dumping shit illegally in a storm drain in Lawrenceville, Ga  which gave off such a noxious smell, a HAZMAT team was called to come in to clean up the mess...

How apropos..

Of course the leftist environmentalists will laugh it off or shrug and continue to support Hillary

And had it been Trump, they'd have wanted his head on a pike, if they don't already..

Gotta love imbecilic blind loyalty to strangers
And yesterday Wikileaks has released the 12th batch of Podesta emails upon the public as the media does everything possible in coordination with the Clinton campaign to outright ignore covering it

About 19,000 released.. Another 31,000 to go..

Highlights of email release #12 include a further insights into Hillary's desire to see Obamacare "unravel", her contempt for "doofus" Bernie Sanders, staff exchanges on handling media queries about Clinton “flip-flopping” on gay marriage, galvanizing Latino support and locking down Clinton’s healthcare policy.
Just as notable has been the ongoing revelation of just how "captured" the so-called independent press has been in its "off the record" discussions with John Podesta which got the head Politico correspondent, Glenn Thrush, to admit he is a "hack" for allowing Podesta to dictate the content of his article.

The NY Times did the same by not only allowing Hillary's team to approve all questions in advance of an article they wrote months ago, but had email correspondence to make sure the Q's were tailored to be pleasing to the bitch..

One of the initially notable emails is the close relationship between the Clinton Foundation and Ukraine billionaire Victor Pinchuk, a prominent donor to the Clinton Foundation, in which we see the latter's attempt to get a meeting with Bill Clinton to show support for Ukraine

Written on Mar 30, 2015:

"Victor Pinchuk is relentlessly following up (including this morning) about a meeting with WJC in London or anywhere in Europe. Ideally he wants to bring together a few western leaders to show support for Ukraine, with WJC probably their most important participant...

Are folks comfortable offering Victor a private meeting on one of those dates? At this point I get the impression that although I keep saying WJC cares about Ukraine, Pinchuk feels like WJC hasn't taken enough action to demonstrate that, particularly during this existential moment for the county and for him."

WJC is William Jefferson Clinton
Another notable moment emerges in the emails, involving Hillary Clinton's selective memory.

Clinton’s description of herself as a moderate Democrat at a September 2015 event in Ohio caused an uproar amongst her team. In a mail from Clinton advisor Neera Tanden to Podesta in the days following the comment she asks why Hillary said this.

“I pushed her on this on Sunday night. She claims she didn't remember saying it. Not sure I believe her,” Podesta replies.

Tanden insists that the comment has made her job more difficult after “telling every reporter I know she's actually progressive... It worries me more that she doesn't seem to know what planet we are all living in at the moment,”
In the latest batch of emails it also shows how at the time Presidential Elect Obama was kept in the loop on the AIG bailout by current Fed Governor Dan Tarullo and asked not do make any policy decisions once in office to undo it, or rattle markets while the bailouts were taking place..


FROM:    Dan Tarullo
SUBJECT:    Restructuring of AIG Deal

November 9, 2008

I received a call earlier this evening from (Treasury) Secretary Paulson and (Federal Reserve) Chairman Bernanke informing me on a confidential basis that, before the markets open tomorrow morning, they will be announcing a significant restructuring of the AIG bailout package.  

They are taking this step in order to avoid what they asserted would be a systemic crisis.
They apparently were anticipating a downgrading of AIG’s debt to below investment grade status.  Had this occurred, they believe (reasonably, in my view) that a run on AIG would almost certainly have ensued.  

The essentials of the restructuring are that the Treasury will be using the TARP to make a $40 billion investment of preferred stock into AIG.  This sum will be used to allow AIG to begin repaying the money it has borrowed from the Fed facility.  They will thereby reduce the amount of debt on AIG’s balance sheet and thus avoid the ratings downgrade.   
Until AIG can begin selling assets, however, it will continue to draw on the Fed liquidity facility, just not in the amounts originally provided...

There will likely be some criticism from economic and market observers, because this restructuring has relaxed the terms of financing for AIG without additional taxpayer benefits (in the form of additional warrants, for example).  

Moreover, although Secretary Paulson emphasized that the terms of the injection of preferred stock were less favorable than those of the initial rounds of investments last month in Citi, Goldman, etc., my understanding is that Treasury will be initially waiving payments of dividends.

As to our reaction – we surely do not want to unnerve markets by saying anything that would suggest your Treasury Department would undo this modification after January 20.  

However, the combination of the questionable terms of the original Fed lending and failure to increase the effective stake of taxpayers as part of this deal means that we should avoid saying anything that would identify us with this move.  

Our position is perhaps best framed as regret that it was necessary to make these changes in the September arrangement...
So economically 'progressive' candidate Obama, the man of the people in 2008 was told of the AIG move of giving AIG $40,000,000,000 based on 'questionable terms' and failure to benefit taxpayers, and once in office, he did Nothing to alter or rectify the situation

And like every decision he's made in office, Obama only cares about pleasing the wealthy and Wall Street.

And the everyday Democrats living paycheck to paycheck or on government handouts love him..

Who would have known emails could be so revealing and to Democrat voters not matter one bit...

Thought Dems were the party of donkeys, not ostriches
Hillary could rape a child with a hairbrush handle or take a long knife and behead someone a la ISIS and post a video on YouTube and we honestly do not think a single registered Democrat would alter their vote

Yet everyone is supposed to get all up in arms and jump ship because Trump uses locker room words to describe a gender that has members which in 2016 society more vile, classless, disgusting and gutteral than even the menfolk

More offensive sexual language about men could be heard uttered in a typical episode of 'Sex in the City'

More emails & revelations that liberals will choose to ignore, to come..

Tuesday, October 18, 2016

Wikileaks - Specific Examples from 7/31/15 how Team Hillary directs Media what to Report

Among the ninth round of Podesta email releases by Wikileaks was a July 31, 2015 email by Hillary Clinton's National Press Secretary Brian Fallon who lays out the agenda for the day's rollout of Clinton's tax record..

More importantly, Hillary's "excellent health" medical statement, where once again the media, listed as "AP, Politico, WSJ, WaPo, etc" is exposed as coordinating and colluding with the campaign to send a message that the very old woman is in great health.

In the email written in the early hours on that day, Fallon writes that in the "rollout plan" for that same day, the campaign will "Pitch the first round of stories to the travelling press corps (AP, Politico, WSJ, WaPo, etc) with a 2 pm embargo."
He goes on to say that for these stories "we will provide the full text of HRC’s physician’s letter, summarizing that she is in excellent health and is medically fit to perform the duties of President. We will push that she is the FIRST presidential candidate to release this info."

In further evidence of the prepared media narrative, Fallon points out that "we expect the stories that pop at 2 pm to have headlines such as “CLINTON IN ‘EXCELLENT HEALTH,’ MEDICAL RECORDS SAY” … “CLINTON RELEASES HEALTH REPORT."

Did you notice that word?

Expect..    As in 'We Expect you to comply and do as instructed'..
Fallon also plans out how to approach the "friendly" press in an attempt to "one-up" Jeb Bush, who at the time was seen as her biggest challenger, in terms of financial disclosures, and specifically her tax filings.

"In describing that the tax returns are forthcoming, we will stress that the  amount of our disclosure will better Jeb’s in three key ways:

TOTAL YEARS OF RETURNS: Jeb made a big deal of releasing 33 years of returns, a record for a presidential candidate.  Today we are posting the Clintons’ returns from 2007-2014 on our website.

The returns for ’92-2006 were already available online, and 1977-1991 were reported on extensively when they were made available.  Today’s release means that Hillary Clinton has made 38 years of returns available to the press over the course of her career.
SPEECH INCOME: In addition to her returns, Hillary Clinton is releasing itemized income amounts for each speech delivered by her and President in 2013. (She has already done it for 2014 and the early part of 2015). Jeb did not do this.

INCOME SOURCES THAT PASSED THROUGH LLC: HRC will also itemize the income that went through her and the President’s LLC entities. Jeb has refused to disclose the clients from whom he derived income that passed through his LLC known as Jeb Bush and Associates."

As Fallon explains, "the lead of most of these stories will be the health records since they are being released in full, but the lower paragraphs of the stories will focus on how the campaign says it will improve upon Jeb Bush’s level of disclosure when the tax returns emerge."
Do you see how this parasite Fallon who remember now is Clinton's Press Secretary is not only directly but specifically telling their press allies what the narrative of the stories should be and in the case of newspapers and online sites, how to structure their writing; =

He even provides the specific bullet points and the order in which they expect the press to present to the public

Then from here, editors tell their minions what to write and how to write it (of newsroom directors tell the pretty people in front of the camera how to report it) and then Ta Da.. You have 'news'
Fallon then goes on to list the further sequence of events that will be revealed in collaboration with the press:

"At 3 PM: We will provide the travelers list with the toplines of Clinton’s 2014 tax returns, emphasizing their effective tax rates (both federal and state-federal, combined). 

We will also provide advance text of the statement from HRC about how the wealthy – a category in which she includes herself – ought to pay their fair share, not seek to shrink or shirk their obligations.  We will provide these materials on embargo until 4 pm. 

We expect the headlines from this round to include: “CLINTONS PAID xx% RATE IN 2014” … “CLINTON, RELEASING RETURNS, SAYS WEALTHY SHOULD PAY MORE.”

Once again.. There's that 'E' word..   'We EXPECT..'
Continuing on the email leaks, he collaboration with the press continues as follows:

"From this point on, reporters will dig into specific details in search of negative storylines, and re-write the Round 1 and Round 2 stories to reflect the additional detail.  Among the storylines we expect reporters to zero in on once they dive into the full returns:

The actual income amounts (to the dollar) reported by the Clintons for 2014, and cumulatively for the eight years reported. (Previously, their incomes only needed to be stated as a range under the Personal Financial Disclosure Form).   Using this figure, reporters will dwell on the Clintons’ sheer wealth.

The fact of HRC’s LLC entity. Again, we will try to put the focus on how we are going beyond what Jeb did in disclosing all the income sources for this LLC, but the fact of it will be new to reporters.

The actual income amount earned by WJC from his consulting contracts, especially Laureate."

From CNN, August 29, 2016  -- "After Hillary Clinton became secretary of state, Bill Clinton received $17.6 million in payments from a for-profit university. Since that time, another organization with a connection to that university received almost $90 million in grants from an agency that's part of the State Department."
Of particular interest is Fallon's own admission in the emails that "reporters will also scrutinize the 2013 speech list for overlap between speech hosts and campaign/Foundation donors that could fuel “pay-to-play” storylines." 

Fallon concludes that "despite these inevitable angles, based on the framing performed in the earlier rounds of stories, we will have given ourselves the best possible, “fighting” chance of promoting the most helpful storylines (i.e., the superlative of being the first candidate to release her health records, the Clintons’ high effective tax rate, their call for a more progressive tax code that asks wealthy individuals like themselves to pay more, the heightened transparency of HRC’s tax returns as compared to Jeb’s, etc)."
So Fallon not only provides the subject topic for the press to focus on but the headlines, the context and the synopsis

And all Expected to be done as laid out..

All this took place several months after a March 2015 email exchange in which campaign manager Robby Mook wrote John Podesta who is running the Clinton election team, asking if he had talked to Hillary "about her taxes and health.

In those Podesta leaked emails, he admits that both topics are "hypersensitive" to her, yet adding that "both are better dealt with very early so we control them--rather than responding to calls for transparency."
That is how that rotten bitch Hillary's well-greased organization maintained the lid on her health narrative from day one, and prevented it from sliding out of control in an undesired direction by coordinating with the "friendly press."

Of course, it was unable to do so for too long, so once it became visually apparent that something was wrong with her (most likely early-stage Parkinsons), at that point the Clinton campaign would simply smear those non-compliant press as "alt-right" elements, or as has been the case recently, invoke "Russian-support" elements and suggest it is one vast conspiracy..

Well at least until a video of Hillary collapsing on September 11 emerged and confirmed it was all just "conspiracy fact."

Then she opened a pickle jar on a late night talk show and showed the world she's healthy and strong..

Wheww.. So relieved..

Monday, October 17, 2016

Don't Read Papers? Your Uninformed; Do Read Papers? You're Misinformed

We're sure we are not alone in saying this Presidential election is one mentally exhausting, drawn out affair and like it or not, there seems to be no escape from it..

Entertainment.. Sports.. Even the Comic Strips..

An endless barrage of anti-Trump venom based on nothing real except his political party affiliation..

Switch the D and R so that Trump is the Democrat and Hillary the Republican and while we'd still hate her no matter what she was, to the media, Hollywood and every loyal lapdog Democrat, Trump would be 'The Man' and be passionately defended at every turn
You just can not trust anything you read or watch anymore

Its like Mark Twain once said:  "If you don’t read the papers you’re uninformed. If you do read them, you’re misinformed."

Understand this -- The current election is not the first time people have had to choose between two personally unpopular candidates

What makes this election so horrible to follow is the lack of any pretense of objectivity on the part of the media that they want Hillary and all her policies of political correctness, social progressivism and stacking the Court with like minded half-souls Badly and wish Trump dead..  genuinely

Even the Wall Street Journal opined over the weekend how pathetic and unfair the coverage has been and makes some effort to paint an honest account of Hillary's wretchedness.. It was quite detailed:
From WSJ, Friday 10/14/16 (in blue font):

"If average voters turned on the TV for five minutes this week, chances are they know that Donald Trump made lewd remarks a decade ago and now stands accused of groping women.

But even if average voters had the TV on 24/7, they still probably haven’t heard the news about Hillary Clinton: That the nation now has proof of pretty much everything she has been accused of.

It comes from hacked emails dumped by WikiLeaks, documents released under the Freedom of Information Act, and accounts from FBI insiders. 
The media has almost uniformly ignored the flurry of bombshells, preferring to devote its front pages to the Trump story. So let’s review what amounts to a devastating case against a Clinton presidency.

Start with a June 2015 email to Clinton staffers from Erika Rottenberg, the former general counsel of LinkedIn. Ms. Rottenberg wrote that none of the attorneys in her circle of friends “can understand how it was viewed as ok/secure/appropriate to use a private server for secure documents AND why further Hillary took it upon herself to review them and delete documents.” 

She added: “It smacks of acting above the law and it smacks of the type of thing I’ve either gotten discovery sanctions for, fired people for, etc.”

A few months later, in a September 2015 email, a Clinton confidante fretted that Mrs. Clinton was too bullheaded to acknowledge she’d done wrong. “Everyone wants her to apologize,” wrote Neera Tanden, president of the liberal Center for American Progress. “And she should. Apologies are like her Achilles’ heel.

Clinton staffers debated how to evade a congressional subpoena of Mrs. Clinton’s emails—three weeks before a technician deleted them. 

The campaign later employed a focus group to see if it could fool Americans into thinking the email scandal was part of the Benghazi investigation (they are separate) and lay it all off as a Republican plot.
Meanwhile, as Fox News reported this past Thursday, according to an anonymous source within the FBI the "vast majority" of the people that worked on Hillary's case thought she should be prosecuted adding that "it was unanimous that we all wanted her [Clinton’s] security clearance yanked."

The source, who spoke to Fox on the condition of anonymity, said FBI Director James Comey’s dramatic July 5 announcement that he would not recommend to the Attorney General’s office that the former secretary of state be charged left members of the investigative team dismayed and disgusted. 

More than 100 FBI agents and analysts worked around the clock with six attorneys from the DOJ’s National Security Division, Counter Espionage Section, to investigate the case.

“No trial level attorney agreed, no agent working the case agreed, with the decision not to prosecute -- it was a top-down decision,” said the source, whose identity and role in the case has been verified by

A high-ranking FBI official told Fox News that while it might not have been a unanimous decision, “It was unanimous that we all wanted her [Clinton’s] security clearance yanked.”

“It is safe to say the vast majority felt she should be prosecuted,” the senior FBI official told Fox News. “We were floored while listening to the FBI briefing because Comey laid it all out, and then said ‘but we are doing nothing,’ which made no sense to us.”
Moreover, the Wall Street Journal points out that the Obama administration was seemingly "working as an extension of the Clinton campaign" with both the State Department and DOJ providing frequent updates to Hillary staffers about a confidential criminal investigation into her misconduct.

"The Obama administration—the federal government, supported by tax dollars—was working as an extension of the Clinton campaign. The State Department coordinated with her staff in responding to the email scandal, and the Justice Department kept her team informed about developments in the court case.

Worse, Mrs. Clinton’s State Department, as documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act show, took special care of donors to the Clinton Foundation. 
In a series of 2010 emails, a senior aide to Mrs. Clinton asked a foundation official to let her know which groups offering assistance with the Haitian earthquake relief were “FOB” (Friends of Bill) or “WJC VIPs” (William Jefferson Clinton VIPs). Those who made the cut appear to have been teed up for contracts. Those who weren’t? Routed to a standard government website.

The leaks show that the foundation was indeed the nexus of influence and money. 

The head of the Clinton Health Access Initiative, Ira Magaziner, suggested in a 2011 email that Bill Clinton call Sheikh Mohammed of Saudi Arabia to thank him for offering the use of a plane. In response, a top Clinton Foundation official wrote: “Unless Sheikh Mo has sent us a $6 million check, this sounds crazy to do.”

WSJ also takes direct aim at the press and admits that the "leaks also show that the press is in Mrs. Clinton’s pocket."

"The leaks also show that the press is in Mrs. Clinton’s pocket. Donna Brazile, a former Clinton staffer and a TV pundit, sent the exact wording of a coming CNN town hall question to the campaign in advance of the event. 

Other media allowed the Clinton camp to veto which quotes they used from interviews, worked to maximize her press events and offered campaign advice.

Mrs. Clinton has been exposed to have no core, to be someone who constantly changes her position to maximize political gain. 

Leaked speeches prove that she has two positions (public and private) on banks; two positions on the wealthy; two positions on borders; two positions on energy. Her team had endless discussions about what positions she should adopt to appease “the Red Army”—i.e. “the base of the Democratic Party.”

And millions of Democrats want this rotten, corrupt bitch to be President
It is smply because she's the Democrat and they delusionally wax nostalgic about the days her scummy faux-husband, Bill (there is not a greater sham marriage in the world today - they probably have not shared the same bed since he was Governor of Arkansas)

There's a maxim that people get what they deserve and most people have shown such ignorance to her bankrupt character, that they really deserve Hillary..

Problem of course is that we like millions of others who genuinely are informed and want a better America will be affected adversely too

And speaking only for ourselves, we're not moving abroad if the Democrat, female version of Richard Nixon wins