Search This Blog

Thursday, May 25, 2017

When Will the Western World Experience their 'Pearl Harbor' Moment?

~ How many Western people here and abroad have died at the hands of Islam since 9/11 and we still can not bring ourselves as a society or civilization to declare war on them?

Yesterday we posed a bunch of questions for you the reader to privately ponder and answer regarding what seems to be this never-ending barrage of Islamic extremist terror upon innocents

So today we ask one more question:

How does Western society go about combating it?
Obviously we believe in military force but we're not talking about an army of a nation wearing bright colored uniforms with flashy brevets and chevrons whom you can easily target as they march in perfectly aligned columns like in the days of yore..

A military response in itself is just not enough

Now the prevailing sentiment among many European nations and Democrats here at home is that of preaching, love, tolerance, acceptance, and glorifying Islam in a most propagandistic positive light while shaming or branding racist or xenophobic who challenge this narrative

So how has 'Hate has no home here' been working out?
Others believe the only way to truly protect one's community or nation from the Muslim threat is to simply expel them.  And if that's no feasible, have the government create some sort of database to track their movements, etc..

It would take a seismic attack or a lot of continual hitting of soft targets for any government to have the guts to go to that extreme so for right now, those options are just fiction

We honestly do not see any genuine way that Western society can effectively combat the scourge because in the minds of the terrorist organizations like ISIS the fight is not against meddling in Middle East affairs or any specific government or anything economic or political

The fight is against Western society itself
We have become a very homogenized planet over the last 100 years..   The vast majority of people around the globe dress like Westerners, watch our movies and TV shows and listen to our music..

There's Pizza Huts in Saudi Arabia and KFC in Kuwait and from Indonesia to Iran, they wear blue jeans, watch dubbed versions of The Simpsons on TV and drink Coke or Pepsi..

This is what the terrorists are against; the continual infiltration of Western consumerism, capitalism and social-cultural beliefs injected in a nonstop barrage into their world

We're not defending it..  Just explaining it..
We could give a lot of specific examples but at its root, you have people living in the 21st century still living through the prism of the 11th century..

Their holy book is Literal..   Word for word..   No nuance..   No interpretation..

No room for any Muslim altering the Quran to adapt to their modern life;  To them, you adapt your life to the Quran or you deserve to lose it
To many Westerners, there really isn't a strong deep belief in God; with few exceptions the 'God' which the 21st century man and woman respects most is government; They bow down to the alter of secularism

Most Westerners have more respect in obeying traffic laws then the Ten Commandments..

Extremists deeply hate secularism; the laws of man mean nothing when they come in conflict with the laws of their Prophet
So how do you go about fighting That?    With hashtag tweets about love and insipid yard signs?

Or is the way to pacify them is by going overboard glorifying their beliefs; by saying Sharia Law is valid and realistic in the 21st century or blaming all women who don't wear head coverings and concealing clothes for any sexual attacks and rapes perpetrated on them?

America in the 1930's was an extremely confused nation..  It was overly tolerant and excessively embracing of fascism, totalitarianism and Nazism in many quarters and simply did not want to get involved in fighting evil on other shores

It took Pearl Harbor and the slap in the face shock of it for Americans to wake the fuck up..
9/11 should have been that event in terms of dealing aggressively with Muslims

But thanks to that asshole George Bush and others repeating the lying mantra that 'Islam is Peace', telling everyone to go back to business as usual and the government going out of its way to protect Islamic communities from revenge attacks, the American people were declawed, made impotent and ultimately complacent

So if 3,000 dead couldn't trigger America and the West to unleash hell upon the Islamic world, why should anyone expect it when 25 or so died in Manchester?
And if God forbid an attack by Islamic animals occurred on US soil killing 20,000 people would that really change anything?

Call us cynical, but we still would expect the same cast of characters to cry out that most Muslims are good, decent people and to not blame all for actions of a select few or one and we need to be even more tolerant and understanding..

And really disgusting that we would need an act of severe barbarity 5x as bad as 9/11 to even hope people would stop accepting the as-is and unite as a society to go after them; to alienate and ostracize this cult-faith
 We all know what is going to happen...   nothing..

Americans are going to forget the Manchester attack by the weekend if not already, just like they forgot the Paris attacks or Orlando or San Bernandino and focus on picnics, beach BBQs and NASCAR

Maybe it will take Britons another week; everyone will go back to normal and those liberal fuckers here and abroad who preach tolerance and acceptance will keep winning

We may never 'forget' 9/11 but it no longer angers us into any call of action for revenge and retribution..   It should but it doesn't..
You can not compromise, negotiate or accept n' embrace those who hate every single thing about your existence and want you wiped off the Earth

It took the Jews of the 1930s and 40's a very long time to get this through their heads and by the time they came around to this reality, the Nazis killed off 2/3 of their total European population

The Muslims are worse..  They don't wear easily identifiable uniforms and their target is everyone who do not look at the world and believe Exactly like them

When will the Western world experience their 'Pearl Harbor' moment?

Wednesday, May 24, 2017

Terror, Tragedy and Questions, Questions..

Whenever there is a senseless tragedy like what happened the other night in Manchester, UK what usually happens is everyone wishes to give opinions and answers to explain or rationalize

But instead we're just going to ask some questions..

Take your time and answer each one..  No one is going to know your responses..

It is important in moments like this that instead of being dictated to as to how to think, feel and believe, you as individuals make up your own minds which ultimately is A&G's reason for existing..
Prior to the other night, when do you recall was the last time someone of the Islamic faith committed an act of terror that killed innocent men, women and children?

When was the last time do you recall the perpetrator of such a violent act was to be a Christian?

Or someone Jewish?  Or Hindu?  Or Scientologist?

Or even Atheist?
When was the last time someone of genuine Western European descent and heritage committed an act of terror against innocents like what happened at the concert?

Do you feel in any way the West is at fault?

What do you think the terrorists ultimate goals are?

Do you believe Western society should concede and conform to those goals in order to ensure there be peace?
Do you feel in any way the violence toward Western European and American people is deserved?

Do you feel Western people are historically evil?

Do you feel Arabic Muslim people are historically evil?

Do you feel we are not tolerant enough of the Muslim faith and culture?

Or are we as a society Too tolerant?
Do you feel our general attitude of tolerance and inclusion toward Muslims emboldens them to want to hurt others?

Or do you think things would be worse off if we did not as a society bend over backward to accommodate them?

Do you still hold a very positive view of Islamic people?

If so, had thousands of innocent people died the other night, would you still be determined to embrace Muslims as good people?
Is Islam a religion of peace?    Or is it a religion of hate?

Do you feel safe going to a concert, sporting event or outdoor activity where lots of people converge after this event?

Lastly and we mean this very honestly, who do you see as the greatest danger to the overall peace, safety and stability of the United States and its people-- Terrorists, President Trump or Democrats?

Tuesday, May 23, 2017

The Debt Waters Keep A-Risin'

Today we're going to talk about national debt since no one really ever focuses on it anymore..  Hope we don't scare off all the math haters out there..

Out of boredom, yours truly watched some YouTube videos regarding President Reagan's first year in office and in particular his very first press conference on January 29, 1981

Before Reagan took mundane and stupid questions from the reporters, he read a prepared statement that said among other things he was submitting a request to Congress to raise the debt ceiling...

To $985 billion
In his statement he apologized for doing so but felt it was necessary to control inflation among other reasons given

$985 billion used to be a ton of money..  Now its chicken feed

For instance, the national debt in 2015 was $18.151 Trillion and at the same point in 2016, it was $19.573 Trillion, an increase in 365 days of $1.422 Trillion   (* Today it is at $19.9 Trillion or thereabouts)

In other words, the increased differential in debt between '15 and 16' was of a far greater number than the entirety of the debt when Reagan took office
It is just so impossible to get that kind of debt under any semblance of control when Presidents refuse to raise taxes and cut spending

Reagan's goal of stimulating the economy was massive tax cuts, especially to the wealthy and corporations, with middle class thrown a small financial 'bone'..

When Reagan left office in 1989, the national debt was $2.857 Trillion, meaning an increase of $1.872 Trillion compared to when he first raised the ceiling

Most will say it was due to expanding military spending and engaging in a nuclear arms race, and yes that contributed
But the bigger picture is he cut revenue while dramatically increased spending and any person who runs the household checkbook knows that's a recipe for disaster

When Bush Sr was in office, he tried the same thing - cutting taxes while expanding military spending to accommodate Desert Storm

Ultimately he was forced to go against his 'Read my lips - no new taxes' pledge when he realized the national debt had grown by $1.2 Trillion in only 3 years due to once again, lack of a tax stream revenue to match increased government spending

So we move to the Clinton years..
Admittedly he did a good job containing the national debt as it only rose $1.4 Trillion in a span of 8 years.. ($4.4T in 1993; $5.8T in 2001)

Of course it helps when you raise taxes and receive full economic benefit of the dot.com bubble which only began to deflate during the very tail end of his Administration

So now Bush Jr becomes President and thanks mostly in part to fighting the War on Terror, the national debt just skyrockets by $6 Trillion over a span of 8 years

To be fair, you have to assume 9/11 would have occurred during a President Gore's watch and that he would have engaged the enemy as Bush had..
We like to assume Gore would not have invaded Iraq but honestly who knows if Saddam would have done something to ultimately provoke a military regime change or not

So anyways you have dramatic spending increases and yet Bush gets tax cuts passed which were supposed to be temporary but which Obama made permanent

We all know Obama was a horrific President who allowed the Fed to spend upwards of a Trillion a year to bolster the stock market along with other wasteful spending and more tax reductions

In 2009, the debt was $11.9 Trillion and when he left office four months ago, it was at $19.573, an increase of nearly $8 Trillion
And Lord help us, the President wants to fix the economy by...  Yep..  lowering taxes and expand spending on the military, based on the Reagan trickle-down model

Ugh!

Very few people care anymore on national debt..  It feels so abstract; so out there

The argument basically is 'well, we've survived for the last few decades at high debt and nothing has happened to us so why should it start now'
This belief is allowed to exist because no one ever talks about the debt/GDP ratio which in simple terms means what we spend to maintain good standing in repaying the debt vs the entirety of what the nation does in terms of the domestic economy and trade

When Reagan took office, the percentage was at 31%

In 2016, Obama's last year in office, the percentage was at 105%..

Yes, 105%..
This means we spent more than the entirety of what the nation could produce as an economy

In fact, the debt/GDP ratio has been over 100% since 2013

The whole economic model we've been living under since the 1970s when Nixon took the US off the gold standard is just unsustainable

At this moment, the government spends $600 billion more than it takes in through all revenue streams
Our biggest fear is what could take Trump down isn't the bullshit media with their fake news and axes to grind, but a true economic crash; one that was not allowed to happen in 2008 so that we'd all be through it and sincerely recovered by now

We're honestly not sure he truly gets it because among other things the wealthy and corporations need to be paying far more in taxes, not less

Besides most corporations supported Hillary so why should they get rewarded
Everyone is very complacent on this debt load -- Idiot liberals in particular only get passionate about protecting their social progressive rights to be immoral and unethical deviants

But this heavy debt load is not ever going to decrease.. It will only expand, especially as interest rates increase (the last time our national debt decreased vs the previous year was during the Eisenhower years; 1957 v 1956 to be specific)

When the bough breaks, the stock market plunges and people are wholly unprepared, we hope Trump and his team of Goldman Sachs appointees has a plan to stabilize everything

We like Trump but we're just not confident on this..

Monday, May 22, 2017

Gotta' Keep Up the Fight..

When it comes to free speech and expression, liberals have become the new fascists

Surely you must know this by now..

Say something they don't like at a Commencement Address at a College/University or just simply have a person with conservative beliefs deliver a speech and they'll boo or outright walkout as some Loser students did this weekend to VP Pence's Address at Notre Dame

Or at some radical places like Berkeley, they'll resort to violence and if need be, burn down their institution before an Ann Coulter type gets to speak
And if you ever leave a negative comment about an article written by an idiot liberal or which celebrates something those pieces of refuse do, the hate just pours out of them

For fun and giggles, yours truly decided to experiment by leaving some negative comments about Saturday Night Live and what a putrid show it was on a couple sites

I wasn't trolling.  Everything I wrote was sincere but I did it to see what kind of response I'd get

Goodness the hate I received..    Made me laugh I admit
The funniest was this Hispanic guy calling me a "Republi-Cunt"..  I responded back for him to wait until he was deported back to his home land before writing to me

They can dish it but sure can't take it..

I don't know..  Just made me snicker at the time and energy it took absolute strangers to need to personally curse out someone they never met just because their mental sickness and retardation about their warped political beliefs still had not calmed 6 months after an election

So I did the only thing possible in that circumstance...

I doubled down on the Democrat hate
I accurately called them Losers and addressed other topics how SNL hired token black women years ago because the black actors resented dressing as women (of course Caucasian actors have done so since Shakespeare without complaining) and addressed PC cowardice and how they lacked any true individuality

And then whewwie, the bile just came back in droves

Admittedly it got boring very quickly because calling me a 'bitch' and to fuck myself lacks originality and just does not make for a very interesting read

So I stopped reading the comments, but the experiment just reaffirmed everything we here at A&G have written about liberals
They are very emotionally weak, frail, conformist people who are just unable to think for themselves

They are also bitter, power-hungry people who for the most part hate America and its history, feel guilt and shame in their background (liberal whites) and want to revise and blot out the past while creating a fantasy 'Utopic' world where the US like Caucasians are put in a secondary status

Quite sad really

To be clear, we are not 'White Pride' by any means because it is absolutely silly to feel any sort of pride or self-respect for things that have nothing to do with Individual accomplishment or achievement
Want to be proud that whites created this nation including our Constitution?  OK.. we understand that..   But much more satisfying wouldn't it be to focus on your Personal victories and successes throughout your life, then being part of a grouping?

That's why any kind of racial or ethnic pride or shame is idiotic

No one goes around saying 'I'm a right hander and I am proud!' or needs to set aside a 'heritage' month so they can celebrate having red hair and lots of freckles

Yet make it about race, sexual orientation or religion and they so many desperately need it..   Sad.
Generally speaking people of the political left are greatly unhinged..

Now to the Conservative media, this is cause for a giggle or snicker then they move on to covering other sensational fluff

We see it as far more serious because in many, there is deep violence in their hearts and all they seek is a catalyst spark

They can't personally get atTrump directly so they go after the next best thing - you and I
There is no other reason for douche bag liberals to keep their 'Hate has..' signs on their lawn 6 months after the election..  There's no other reason shit shows like SNL and late night TV continually go for the kill

Used to be the goal was to be political but not alienate because people of all backgrounds watch and spend money buying the products advertised

Guess suddenly Republicans aren't worthy to court even though as people of a political party, we have a much higher median income and greater disposable cash flow to buy big ticket items than Democrats
Notice it's OK to offend Trump and the Silent Majority..   

Notice weeks after saying basically that our President orally pleases Putin, that dog cum swallower Stephen Colbert has never been punished - never suspended or fined or even made to apologize

Had he said it about the black boy President we had before Trump, Colbert would be fired then probably have hung himself knowing he'd never work again in the entertainment industry

We recently read that Jimmy Fallon refuses to do bitter Trump-hate jokes not because he's a Rep, but because its not his nature to be that vicious and Trump supporters watch his show too..

Good for him
So we know its deeply frustrating but you can get these bastards back with comments and do it in a G rated way (and if you don't want garbage sent directly to your personal email, Twitter or Facebook, just create 'dummy' accounts)

1)  Directly tell liberals all their values and beliefs are wrong

2)  Taunt them that no matter what they say or do, Trump still has at least 44 months left.. 
3)  Mention you can't wait for that wall to start being built

4)  Whenever an article is overtly-PC, mention that 'Afr Ams' are really blacks, gay marriage is 'pretend', etc..

You get the point..  
Some would say its childish and immature to sink to their level which of course would be a rather snobby-snotty thing to express, so just ignore them

There is a cultural civil war going on and it is to be fought on all levels from high to low brow

The liberals are full-in..    Conservatives overall seem oblivious
And because Trump is not going after the visual and print media in particular as he needs to because there's so much chaos around him, and outlets like Fox News only really care about profit, it is up to every individual with conservative belief to fight in all venues comfortable to them for their right to be heard

Because believe us, if the left had their way, we would all be like small children to strict parents..

Seen and not heard.

Friday, May 19, 2017

When the 'Swamp' Fights Back

Normally we don't hold any information that comes from any NBC connected network with any sort of value or regard but someone yesterday at CNBC wrote a an article which we pretty much agreed  with (highlighted areas are by us):

"There is, indeed, a bombshell of a story coming out of the news that President Donald Trump revealed sensitive information during his White House meeting with Russian officials last week. 

But it’s not that President Trump committed any crime. The really alarming news is that the duly-elected President of the United States appears to be the target of a political coup.


First, let’s be clear: President Trump has been sloppy, arrogant, and just plain misguided plenty of times during his short tenure in office — including the way he handled the firing of FBI Director James Comey and the hiring and firing of National Security Adviser Michael Flynn. 

And if he did unnecessarily compromise the source of the sensitive information he shared with the Russians, shame on him.

But a president cannot be removed from office for arrogance and sloppiness


Here’s the kicker: None of this is actually working where it counts. 

Again, we have not one piece of evidence of any impeachable act. And it’s not even truly working in the polls. President Trump’s approval ratings may be lower than any modern president this early in his tenure, but they’re still higher than they were throughout the election. 

If anything, these constant attacks coming from this obviously angry and potentially illegal place are only strengthening the resolve of Trump’s base of supporters
They elected a guy they believed was truly the enemy of the established political class. And right on cue, the established political class is stopping at nothing to prove them right...

The bottom line is that we have some very powerful people in Washington who really don’t like how democracy played out this time around and what they do to attack it next isn’t going to be any better than what they’re doing now."

Well written and well said..
Trump said he would drain the swamp and so the swamp is not going to go into the cesspool without a major fight

The President is being attacked by the deep state intelligence community, the liberal corporate media is salivating at the leaks as a means to rid themselves of a man they despise and Congressional Republicans, most who didn't really want Trump during the primaries, are keeping quiet like spineless, impotent cuckold cowards..  
We've seen this played out many times before in our country's history..  

When the powerful elite do not like the results of an election or find out they can not control the person sitting in the Oval Office, they will do anything and everything possible to take that person out including defamation of character, Impeachment and in some cases (JFK) kill that leader outright..

Every time a President has dealt with the threat of impeachment, whether the cause was warranted or not, it was motivated by political hate and the desire to re-acquire power, whether it be the opposition party of those of the same party in Congress wanting to control the nation
We explained in great detail the other day how Whigs & Democrats of the 1840s did everything possible to try to destroy President John Tyler

Back in 1867, the god-awful Radical Republicans desperately tried to impeach Andrew Johnson because he wanted to fire a member of his Cabinet who was appointed originally by Lincoln..  He survived by one vote.

But deeper than that, the Radicals hated that Johnson was not a blood thirsty abolitionist fucker wanting to make the Reconstruction South howl like the Radicals wanted so they did everything they could to destroy him, then backed the anti-Semitic drunkard US Grant to be their nominee in 1868
And when it came to Nixon, the shit Democrats deeply despised the man since the early 1950s when he went after Alger Hiss so impeachment was a payback..

Of course Nixon resigned before they could do it but the Democrats were salivating like rabid, lice ridden dogs

And even though Bill Clinton as a despicable lying piece of backwoods trailer trash who wanted to put his penis in any woman not named Hillary as long as she had a heartbeat and committed perjury during his testimony on the Paula Jones sexual assault case, there was malice in Republicans to finally 'get him'
So when even the mere suggestion of impeachment rears its ugly head about a sitting President, it is always based on hatred

And you have to remember the US power base behind the scenes have a long history of sabotaging Presidents and manipulating events for their own nefarious purposes..

The sinking of the USS Maine which pushed us into a needless (albeit short) war with Spain in 1898.. and The Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964 giving political cover for LBJ to expand military involvement in Vietnam as just two of many incidents
Those low-life soulless piece of shit Democrat losers wanted Trump impeached before he was inaugurated and that is all that has been driving those mindless animals since their rancid closet dyke lost the election

Just saying how it is folks..   Want it sugar coated in G rated corporate friendly language, go read the National Review..

And all this nonsense swirling is coming from illegal leaks from inside the intelligence community..
Remember, and this is important, according to a Breitbart article written on Oct 26, 2016, 97% of political donations by people working in the Department of Justice went to that cunt Hillary..

97 percent!   And we're talking career employees who stay in their jobs no matter who is President

According to TheHill.com, written on the same day, "Of the roughly $2 million that federal workers from 14 agencies spent on presidential politics by the end of September, about $1.9 million, or 95 percent, went to the Democratic nominee’s campaign"

So this is what the President has to deal with
There is no greater enemy to the State right now than liberals..  Not ISIS.. not Al Qaeda..  not any Mexican gang, not Russia or the North Koreans

And because so many of them are still working in the intelligence apparatus of our nation and able to divulge classified top-secret info to the media at will without repercussion, it puts our entire nation at grave risk

Not that they care

To liberals, its the war cry of "Impeachment by Christmas" so by whatever means necessary and let the sky fall

So if you see a Democrat, give them a good hard sock to the mouth..   Um.. figuratively..