Search This Blog

Monday, July 27, 2015

Example of how Media Works to Aid/Assist Old Hillary

~ Yes obviously this pic is doctored..  Still it made you laugh, yes..

In a 24 hour news world, we are constantly bombarded with news, both factual and opinion - it really never lets up..

Even when you think its safe to read the sports section there is always some pipsqueak liberal who has to interject a political zing, as we experienced over the weekend when trying to read a simple story about a baseball no-hitter and the guy decides 'A-ha! Here's a good place to degrade Trump''.

But even with the constant flow of information daily, there's still so much people miss because either we have normal lives to be lived, or the info purposely comes out on the weekend when people are least focused.

Here's a story you probably missed last Friday care of, which shows just how Scummy liberal the New York Times are in their mission to get that wretched old Bitch Hillary elected..
From (7/24/15):

New York Times alters Clinton email story -- "The New York Times made small but significant changes to an exclusive report about a potential criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton's State Department email account late Thursday night, but provided no notification of or explanation for of the changes.

The paper initially reported that two inspectors general have asked the Justice Department to open a criminal investigation "into whether Hillary Rodham Clinton mishandled sensitive government information on a private email account she used as secretary of state."
That clause, which cast Clinton as the target of the potential criminal probe, was later changed: the inspectors general now were asking for an inquiry "into whether sensitive government information was mishandled in connection with the personal email account Hillary Rodham Clinton used as secretary of state."

The Times also changed the headline of the story, from "Criminal Inquiry Sought in Hillary Clinton’s Use of Email" to "Criminal Inquiry Is Sought in Clinton Email Account," reflecting a similar recasting of Clinton's possible role. The article's URL was also changed to reflect the new headline.

As of early Friday morning, the Times article contained no update, notification, clarification or correction regarding the changes made to the article."
Absolutely nothing about the news we read or watch on TV is un-biased.

Even A&G has an agenda which is this:  Both political parties are Shit, there are certain individuals in positions of power we deeply hate & despise (Obama, Hillary, John McCain, Scott Walker) and the only way to ever see any real change is electing people Dem, Rep or Independent who middle-fingers Wall St and the Fed rather than hunger to serve both.

The rest of media really don't have such lofty ideals

Now some could argue that a Democrat president makes Fox News' ratings climb as well as Conservative radio, and MSNBC would much prefer having a Republican to bash and smear with lies 24hrs a day, truth is these and other media units work in ways (sometimes subtle, sometimes not) to get their guy (or gal) elected.
If you want to read Conservative ideas being crapped upon daily and liberalism exalted in both its goodness & rottenness, you pick up the NY Times or Washington Post;  If you want to read the opposite, pick up the NY Post or Washington Times.

Of course pretty much all newspapers in major cities with dense black populations in blue states will be extremely liberal and you will never find anything even remotely balanced unless maybe you read the comics.

The New York Times has been a really bad newspaper for a very long time..

It courts only a segment of the population and basically gives them what they want i.e. a safe haven where all Democrats outside of the Anthony Weiners are good guys wearing white hats, and all Republicans are villains and corporate whores
Meanwhile NYT is no grass roots publication for the masses.. it is a publicly traded company on NYSE and owned by some deeply rich people.

Back on Nov 1, 2003, its stock was trading at $48.60/share, a figure it has not seen as high since...   Today, you can buy shares at $13.21...  Just shows how low this paper of 'esteem' has dropped in people's eyes

So basically you can see why that evil, disingenuous old Bitch Hillary is favored to win at least the Democrat nomination..  

It is not that her ideas or vision is so great or resonates with people or she is found to be warm, sincere or any traits any normal person would seek in a President..
She is favored because the media overall is excessively liberal, they like how the last 6yrs have gone with Oreo in office (even though the nation still suffers from lack of a genuine recovery plan & implementation)...

And no way in hell do they want someone in office like Donald Trump who will say to their faces 'Go fuck yourself' and call out their bias to the population.

So expect a lot more re-editing and touching-up of articles painting old Bitch Hillary as the horrible woman and egotistical criminal that she is.