Search This Blog

Monday, October 17, 2016

Don't Read Papers? Your Uninformed; Do Read Papers? You're Misinformed

We're sure we are not alone in saying this Presidential election is one mentally exhausting, drawn out affair and like it or not, there seems to be no escape from it..

Entertainment.. Sports.. Even the Comic Strips..

An endless barrage of anti-Trump venom based on nothing real except his political party affiliation..

Switch the D and R so that Trump is the Democrat and Hillary the Republican and while we'd still hate her no matter what she was, to the media, Hollywood and every loyal lapdog Democrat, Trump would be 'The Man' and be passionately defended at every turn
You just can not trust anything you read or watch anymore

Its like Mark Twain once said:  "If you don’t read the papers you’re uninformed. If you do read them, you’re misinformed."

Indeed..
Understand this -- The current election is not the first time people have had to choose between two personally unpopular candidates

What makes this election so horrible to follow is the lack of any pretense of objectivity on the part of the media that they want Hillary and all her policies of political correctness, social progressivism and stacking the Court with like minded half-souls Badly and wish Trump dead..  genuinely

Even the Wall Street Journal opined over the weekend how pathetic and unfair the coverage has been and makes some effort to paint an honest account of Hillary's wretchedness.. It was quite detailed:
From WSJ, Friday 10/14/16 (in blue font):

"If average voters turned on the TV for five minutes this week, chances are they know that Donald Trump made lewd remarks a decade ago and now stands accused of groping women.

But even if average voters had the TV on 24/7, they still probably haven’t heard the news about Hillary Clinton: That the nation now has proof of pretty much everything she has been accused of.

It comes from hacked emails dumped by WikiLeaks, documents released under the Freedom of Information Act, and accounts from FBI insiders. 
The media has almost uniformly ignored the flurry of bombshells, preferring to devote its front pages to the Trump story. So let’s review what amounts to a devastating case against a Clinton presidency.

Start with a June 2015 email to Clinton staffers from Erika Rottenberg, the former general counsel of LinkedIn. Ms. Rottenberg wrote that none of the attorneys in her circle of friends “can understand how it was viewed as ok/secure/appropriate to use a private server for secure documents AND why further Hillary took it upon herself to review them and delete documents.” 

She added: “It smacks of acting above the law and it smacks of the type of thing I’ve either gotten discovery sanctions for, fired people for, etc.”


A few months later, in a September 2015 email, a Clinton confidante fretted that Mrs. Clinton was too bullheaded to acknowledge she’d done wrong. “Everyone wants her to apologize,” wrote Neera Tanden, president of the liberal Center for American Progress. “And she should. Apologies are like her Achilles’ heel.

Clinton staffers debated how to evade a congressional subpoena of Mrs. Clinton’s emails—three weeks before a technician deleted them. 

The campaign later employed a focus group to see if it could fool Americans into thinking the email scandal was part of the Benghazi investigation (they are separate) and lay it all off as a Republican plot.
Meanwhile, as Fox News reported this past Thursday, according to an anonymous source within the FBI the "vast majority" of the people that worked on Hillary's case thought she should be prosecuted adding that "it was unanimous that we all wanted her [Clinton’s] security clearance yanked."

The source, who spoke to Fox News.com on the condition of anonymity, said FBI Director James Comey’s dramatic July 5 announcement that he would not recommend to the Attorney General’s office that the former secretary of state be charged left members of the investigative team dismayed and disgusted. 

More than 100 FBI agents and analysts worked around the clock with six attorneys from the DOJ’s National Security Division, Counter Espionage Section, to investigate the case.


“No trial level attorney agreed, no agent working the case agreed, with the decision not to prosecute -- it was a top-down decision,” said the source, whose identity and role in the case has been verified by FoxNews.com.

A high-ranking FBI official told Fox News that while it might not have been a unanimous decision, “It was unanimous that we all wanted her [Clinton’s] security clearance yanked.”

“It is safe to say the vast majority felt she should be prosecuted,” the senior FBI official told Fox News. “We were floored while listening to the FBI briefing because Comey laid it all out, and then said ‘but we are doing nothing,’ which made no sense to us.”
Moreover, the Wall Street Journal points out that the Obama administration was seemingly "working as an extension of the Clinton campaign" with both the State Department and DOJ providing frequent updates to Hillary staffers about a confidential criminal investigation into her misconduct.

"The Obama administration—the federal government, supported by tax dollars—was working as an extension of the Clinton campaign. The State Department coordinated with her staff in responding to the email scandal, and the Justice Department kept her team informed about developments in the court case.

Worse, Mrs. Clinton’s State Department, as documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act show, took special care of donors to the Clinton Foundation. 
In a series of 2010 emails, a senior aide to Mrs. Clinton asked a foundation official to let her know which groups offering assistance with the Haitian earthquake relief were “FOB” (Friends of Bill) or “WJC VIPs” (William Jefferson Clinton VIPs). Those who made the cut appear to have been teed up for contracts. Those who weren’t? Routed to a standard government website.

The leaks show that the foundation was indeed the nexus of influence and money. 

The head of the Clinton Health Access Initiative, Ira Magaziner, suggested in a 2011 email that Bill Clinton call Sheikh Mohammed of Saudi Arabia to thank him for offering the use of a plane. In response, a top Clinton Foundation official wrote: “Unless Sheikh Mo has sent us a $6 million check, this sounds crazy to do.”

WSJ also takes direct aim at the press and admits that the "leaks also show that the press is in Mrs. Clinton’s pocket."

"The leaks also show that the press is in Mrs. Clinton’s pocket. Donna Brazile, a former Clinton staffer and a TV pundit, sent the exact wording of a coming CNN town hall question to the campaign in advance of the event. 

Other media allowed the Clinton camp to veto which quotes they used from interviews, worked to maximize her press events and offered campaign advice.


Mrs. Clinton has been exposed to have no core, to be someone who constantly changes her position to maximize political gain. 

Leaked speeches prove that she has two positions (public and private) on banks; two positions on the wealthy; two positions on borders; two positions on energy. Her team had endless discussions about what positions she should adopt to appease “the Red Army”—i.e. “the base of the Democratic Party.”

And millions of Democrats want this rotten, corrupt bitch to be President
It is smply because she's the Democrat and they delusionally wax nostalgic about the days her scummy faux-husband, Bill (there is not a greater sham marriage in the world today - they probably have not shared the same bed since he was Governor of Arkansas)

There's a maxim that people get what they deserve and most people have shown such ignorance to her bankrupt character, that they really deserve Hillary..

Problem of course is that we like millions of others who genuinely are informed and want a better America will be affected adversely too

And speaking only for ourselves, we're not moving abroad if the Democrat, female version of Richard Nixon wins