Search This Blog

Tuesday, February 28, 2017

Synopsis of Exactly WHY the Media and Trump Hate Each Other

As we all know, President Trump and the media deeply despise one another and it will continue as long as he's in office which hopefully will be another 7 years, 11 months..

So that means we all better get used to it..

The question really is 'Why' and we'll try to answer each side as brief and concise as possible so you come out of today's posting understanding clearly where the hate comes from
We start with the President..  Why does he hate the media?

Simply put, they tried everything humanly possible to sabotage his 2016 Presidential election bid, going way beyond objectively critical reporting to choosing to make it their mission to destroy him..

Of course it failed but that was the goal..
It started right at the first GOP candidates' debate which Fox News hosted -- that vile, despicable faux-feminist Megyn Kelly wanted to knock Trump out with one extremely inappropriate question about his views on women

Trump who unlike most politicians is not a coward, basically gave her a verbal punching right to the face and the relationship between the President and media has only soured further..
All the specific particulars during the election do not bear repeating.. You all know what they were..

So that one is easy to understand..

You would loathe and despise any person or entity that spent over 18 months non-stop trying to destroy you and prevent you from obtaining a life goal you were pursuing, so Trump's reactions make perfect sense
But now the focus becomes why does the media hate Trump?

There really is not one reason that is more than any other.. its just a collection of different factors which have been exasperated by the fact Trump the New Yorker does not take shit from people which is been a key to the growth of his business empire

So let's delve a bit..
1)  The media are elitists..  Left.. Right..  It does not matter..   They are all arrogant, snooty, used to controlling things and will not tolerate anyone in the Presidency doing things his way, especially someone they do not respect.

To the media, Presidents may come and go.. They stay..  They're the gatekeeper

They collectively see Trump as a clown.. a carnival barker..  a TV pitchman which is even lower than that of an actor..

Think of Washington DC like an extremely elitist old-money Country Club where all that matters is your pedigree..   Wealth and individual success does not generate respect in this club..

That's how the media establishment like the political establishment see Trump and nothing outside of a major war won or 9/11 x 100 will ever allow Trump to garner any respect or fondness from any of them
2)  He beat the anointed one..  The heir apparent..

Trump beat The Bitch..

Everyone expected Hillary to win..  Even us at A&G and dreaded every moment of the probability of it..

Its been the worst kept political secret that of course never came to be..   When Hillary decided to originally run for NY Senator, we all knew it wasn't to serve others..  It was to spring board the eventual Presidential run
She lost in 2008 but did so to a black man, so it was perfectly OK to them because as we stated before, pandering to colored people 'trumps' breaking glass ceilings for women

But then its 2016..  And now their beloved Queen to be was being challenged by this man, Trump they saw as classless, uncouth, foul-mouthed and just an utter offense to every delicate, dainty sensibility the media possessed..

Since Hillary couldn't seem to defeat him on her own, they'd have to double down then double some more to work to ensure this Neanderthal did not win
3)  Trump is  against every political and social value & belief the media possesses..

Globalism.. Open Borders..  The UN being Supreme power with nation rights gone.. Extreme tolerance for that cult-faith Islam..  A nation where those who work pay for those including welfare and healthcare..  A nation where anyone Caucasian who isn't filled with race-guilt is evil and to be shut up and shit on..

And then add to it, Trump openly attacking their precious chocolate-skinned President as a 'disaster', a Cocoa Krispie monkey who many in the media probably love even more than their own spouses or children and stating he would systematically dismantle Obama's legacy...

You can see from that context how this war against Trump is so personal
4)  To make it even More personal, upon winning Trump calls the major network news heads and senior reporters to Trump Tower and basically tells them directly to their faces they're worthless liars and total garbage..

He even directed his attacks personally at CNN head Jeff Zucker at one point in the meeting..

We don't know too many people who can take such truth-based negativity directed square at them with a smile and a Jesus-like forgiveness, and the media have more fragile egos than even Congresspeople

And at every opportunity, Trump himself doubles down to attack them when they come after him with fake news, non news and purposeful holding back of information that is positive because it goes against their narrative that he's a fake and a failure.
So if you didn't understand already, this contentiousness on both sides is extremely personal and a big reason why no one in our lifetimes has ever seen anything sustained like this..

The media deeply hated Nixon even before Watergate but he pretty much played the polite game, was civil and non-antagonistic and the media responded in kind to a point..

Now the last question that needs to ask is why do networks like CNN and newspapers like NY Times keep up the attacks when it has to hurt their business model?
For instance, during the week of February 13, when looking at ratings of programming between the 7 day 8-11PM time slot, CNN was the 10th ranked cable network with an average of 1 million households watching for at least 15 minutes during the prime time hours...

Fox News was #1 with on average nearly 2.2 million viewers during the same time period

Now as for the Times, even though they refuse to admit their numbers are dwindling, truth is that back in 2013, 1.8 million people subscribed to the Times in some form-- print, digital, etc..

Today it is around 1.2 million..
Blame it on their horribly left-leaning biased coverage or the continued death of the newspaper or anything else you want but that's a loss of 600,000 readers in print and online in just 4 years..

So how do these entities survive financially?

Niche news has niche audiences that are more than happy to devote time and resources to entities that tell them their worldview is right even though it is of course not..

Also advertisers today are extremely scared to offend anyone, and while Conservatives usually do not make a stink when companies or TV/print ads are blatantly offensive such as promoting bi-racial families and homosexual & transgender relations as normal), putrid Liberals do..
That's why shit companies like Kellogg's will pull all their advertising from conservative website Breitbart for instance while still heavily buying TV time and print ads with liberal anti-Trump trash outlets

We said this yesterday.. Say it again today..

Ultimately Trump is going to have to choose to either deal with the parasitic left-leaning media like Lincoln and Woodrow Wilson did or to allow them to run amok like LBJ and Nixon did..

And if Trump does nothing but to stay on present course of tweeting and press conference venting, and think that's the solution, he is looking at one messy Disaster, to use one of his favorite words

Monday, February 27, 2017

Trump & the Media - Reaching A Fork in the Road

Let us start today's posting by imagining just for a second a fantasy scenario..

That President Trump, having been thoroughly sick of the purposely lying and intentionally distorting media issues an executive order entitled "Arrest and Imprisonment of Irresponsible Newspaper Reporters and Editors"

And in this Order, Trump believing these press people are hurting the nation and causing aid & comfort to our enemies abroad, directs the military to arrest and imprison such individuals, while holding them without due process as long as the President sees fit..
So how would you feel about that?

Would you still like/love Trump or turn you against him?  If you hate Trump, would you hate him even more?

He'd probably be vilified for all of history, right?
Then again a former President did exactly this among other un-Constitutional and illegal actions during his time in office that crushed the Bill of Rights under his foot and yet all is forgiven; everyone to this day just loves and idolizes the man

Many cities and schools and streets are named after him. there's this big Monument in DC erected in his honor and his ugly face adorns both our paper money and coinage.

Yes.. we're talking of the 'great' Abraham Lincoln.
The executive order to which we referred earlier was dated May 18, 1864.

It was in response to a forged proclamation published in the newspapers the New York World, and the New York Journal of Commerce (both no longer in existence) where supposedly Lincoln called for 400,000 fresh troops, and purposed to raise by an "immediate and peremptory draft," whatever quotas were not furnished on the day specified.
This official Order stated (paragraph breaks and 'bold' text is from us):

"Whereas there has been wickedly and traitorously printed and published this morning in the New York World and New York Journal of Commerce, newspapers printed and published in the city of New York, a false and spurious proclamation purporting to be signed by the President and to be countersigned by the Secretary of State, which publication is of a treasonable nature, designed to give aid and comfort to the enemies of the United States and to the rebels now at war against the Government and their aiders and abettors..
You are therefore hereby commanded forthwith to arrest and imprison in any fort or military prison in your command the editors, proprietors, and publishers of the aforesaid newspapers, and all such persons as, after public notice has been given of the falsehood of said publication, print and publish the same with intent to give aid and comfort to the enemy; and you will hold the persons so arrested in close custody until they can be brought to trial before a military commission for their offense. 

You will also take possession by military force of the printing establishments of the New York World and Journal of Commerce, and hold the same until further orders, and prohibit any further publication therefrom."
Absolutely amazing how little people know about Lincoln other than the simplicity of 'Great Emancipator'

Lincoln stomped on both the 1st and 5th Amendments and he is beloved for eternity; If Trump did this to the even more diabolical media today, people would seek to give the President the Louis XVI treatment..

When it came to winning the war and getting any of his policies through, Lincoln believed that "with public sentiment nothing can fail; without it, nothing can succeed."

So in essence, the means justified the end.
Now let's look at moment at the opposite approach to dealing with the media i.e. the LBJ and Nixon way..

Both Presidents pretty much left the media, which was obviously by the 1960s TV as well as newspapers alone to do as they wanted and in the process worked in a calculating manner to present the Vietnam war in the most negative possible light

Every report gloomy.. Every interview with a grunt soldier was bleak or despondent..  Every day the message was 'Why are we even here?"

And it beat down hard on the spirit of everyday Americans over time to such an extent that the soldiers were for the first time (and hopefully only time) looked upon with repugnance as murderers and baby-killers and came home to no parade of honoring of any kind..
Fortunately starting with President Bush 41's operation of the Gulf War in 1991, the Pentagon took a much more controlled policy as to what access the media could have and what they could report so not aid the enemy

When dealing with a hate-filled media used to being in charge of framing & molding the news to fit their ideologies, eventually Trump is going to have to decide if he wants to be like Lincoln or like LBJ & Nixon

Tweets and press conference vents really are not enough anymore..

In ending this posting, we thought we'd spend a couple sentences on last night's Academy Awards

The blacks sure were happy--  Both supporting awards and Best Picture..

Then again, since they have such a deep inferiority complex as a race, we can imagine many were unhappy they did not sweep all categories..
'Moonlight' won..  A film that has grossed domestically a pathetic $22 million meaning no one wanted to bother to see a film about gay blacks which fits all the criteria of Academy voters - pushes a social issue or cause and no one wants to see it..

And if a film is supposedly good enough to be a Best Picture winner, how does it not win Best Director or Actor..

Or maybe the film really wasn't that good; that 'La La' Land should have won since its Director and leading actress already had..

Or maybe 'La La' just wasn't black enough and wouldn't make up for all those blacks bitching and complaining like spoiled children last year..

Who knows.. Who cares..

Friday, February 24, 2017

How Mexico (along with Germany) Pushed the US into World War I

On April 6, 1917, it will mark the 100th Anniversary of America's entrance in World War I

And though it took about another year to fully mobilize and our actual fighting was six months, nonetheless over 116,000 (637 a day) Americans died 'over there' to quote the famous song of the period..

But if you want to know exactly Why we entered Europe's war, the anniversary of that event which put everything into motion was today February 24th.
The sinking of the USS Lusitania the previous year by the Germans in which US civilians were among the casualties and the need for US bankers to recoup their loans to the Allies which could only be done if Germany lost, were factors in our involvement

But it was the Zimmerman Telegraph that cinched it.
The Zimmerman Telegram (or Zimmerman Note or Zimmerman Cable) was a secret diplomatic communication issued from the German Foreign Office in January 1917 that proposed a military alliance between Germany and Mexico in the event of the United States' entering World War I against Germany.

Specifically,  Germany pledged to ensure the return of New Mexico, Texas, and Arizona to Mexico if Mexico declares war on the United States.
The proposal was intercepted and decoded by British intelligence  and given to the U.S. ambassador  to Britain on February 24 which is the first time anyone in the US knew of this.

Revelation of the contents enraged American public opinion, especially after the German Foreign Secretary Arthur Zimmerman publicly admitted the telegram was genuine on March 3rd and helped generate massive support for the United States declaration of war on Germany in April.
Can you imagine how are nation would look today if we had lost the war and those brown bean-eaters acquired back all that territory?

Trump would still need to build a wall to keep the the job stealers and freeloaders out but it would have to go from Arkansas to Oklahoma to Nevada to California..

Talk about a massive border wall!
So this event along with a policy put in place by the Germans on February 1st, 1917 that they would begin unrestricted submarine warfare against all ships in the Atlantic bearing the American flag, both passenger and merchant ships (they sunk two ships in February) got the ball started on motivating the public to support war

Germany had long sought to incite a war between Mexico and the U.S., which would have tied down American forces and slowed the export of American arms to the Allies and the Kraut-heads had engaged in a pattern of actively arming, funding and advising the Mexicans.
There was the 1914 Ypiranga Incident where the SS Ypiranga, a German steamer commissioned to transport arms and munitions to the Mexican federal government under Victoriano Huerta was denied entry into Mexican port as part of a larger US controlled embargo on the country as punishment for Huerta's violence towards Mexican citizens during a civil war that was taking place there back then.

President Woodrow Wilson then ordered the military invasion of Veracruz later that year.

War was prevented thanks to the Niagara Falls peace conference but the occupation of that city was a decisive factor in Mexican neutrality in World War I.
In 1915 the German Naval Intelligence officer Franz von Rintelen had attempted to incite a war between Mexico and the United States giving Huerta $12 million for that purpose.

The German saboteur Lothar Witzke — responsible for the March 1917 munitions explosion at the Mare Island Naval Shipyard in the Bay Area (6 American civilians dead, 31 wounded) and possibly responsible for the July 1916 Black Tom explosion in New Jersey (the blast caused damage to the Statue of Liberty and ripples could be felt as far south as Philadelphia) — was based in Mexico City
Then there was the August 27, 1918 Battle of Ambos Nogales faught between Mexican forces and elements of the US 35th Infantry Regiment, who were reinforced by the Buffalo Soldiers (black soldiers) of the 10th Cavalry.

While a very small handful of soldiers died, as a result of this battle, the US and Mexico agreed to divide the two border communities with a chain-link border fence, the first of many permanent incarnations of the U.S.–Mexico border wall between the two countries.
So you can see how for a very long time, the Mexican government have been absolute pests to the US and unlike how the shit-liberal media wishes to spin things,  the relationship was not all peaches n' cream until that 'terrible' Trump came along..

There's still a lot of genuinely stupid Mexican and Mexican-American radicals who honestly believe there will come a day all the land the Mexicans humiliatingly gave away as a result of the 1846-48 Mexican War (now US states) will be returned to their sovereignty..

Aye Carumba!  Lo que un pueblo estúpido...

Mexico may be our neighbor to the south but it is certainly no ally and its never been our friend..

Thursday, February 23, 2017

'Hacksaw Ridge'.. More like Hackjob..

Even though we have no intention of watching this Sunday night's Oscars telecast (mostly because we're not going to sit through 3.5 hours of Trump-hate by privileged, wealthy people pretending they are everyday folk) we still decided last night to rent a film that is nominated..

So we sat through 'Hacksaw Ridge' which is supposed to be a true story about a conscious objector who still decided to enlist and serve during WWII as a medic while refusing to kill the enemy..

The person in the film did exist but we have seen enough movies to know that 'true' and 'accurate' are not one and the same..  Often for entertainment purposes, characters are composites of many people and events are condensed for time, because the flow of a film matters more than honesty.
But that aside..

We know it got many positive reviews and a lot of people liked it but really it was a brutal sit-through and not because of violence and gore which one sees often during the battle scenes..

It really felt more like movie of week material and why is over 95% of the cast Australian if its a film about American soldiers?

Guess director and professional Jew-hater Mel Gibson was going for um.. realism, yes?  Well that or trying to save a couple bucks by shooting the film about US heroism Down Under..
The film just lacked polish and without giving away anything to someone who plans on seeing the film later, he main character objects to killing (fine) but he can't even touch a rifle during basic training???

The guy bases his belief on not killing on Bible scripture which is alright but where does it read in either Old or New Testament "Thall shalt not shoot at paper targets?"

So it ends up being just another anti-war film which frankly we're sick of.

That is not to say we want to see a pro-killing film made by Hollywood but we're genuinely sick and tired of anti-war messages being injected during good or necessary wars
You hear people all the time wish for peace and no more violence and killing, especially during Christmas..

Well here's how you get that end-result..

When another nation invades yours, you simply do nothing..  No Army.. No Navy.. No Marines or Air Force...

Just let it happen like Czechoslovakia did prior to WWII..  Just let the enemy peacefully in so they can take over and dominate without a shot fired
And if on the battlefield someone points a gun at you, well just do nothing --  take the bullet..

When enough troops on your side fall to the ground with open eyes to match the open bullet wounds, then the killing will cease because there will be no one left to kill..

So that's how you get peace on earth and no war..

Just let the aggressor do as they wish and take it peaceably with the hope that God will intervene like he did back in the days of Moses
Is war terrible?  Absolutely..  But is it also necessary?   Yes it is...

It should be the last resort but a justified pursuit nonetheless..

Imagine if the US military of the 1940s were as passive as the objector treated like some G-D hero in this film..

Not a doubt in our minds that if America did not do what we did back in WWII the entire world would be suffocated by an Axis of true Evil as the globe would be subjugated by either the Nazis, Fascist Italians or the Japs..  
Imagine if US soldiers during the Civil War took a pacifist view of war and refused to fight.. We'd have two nations today..  Personally it would be fine by us but we know a lot of people would be sickened by the thought..

Imagine if those who went up against the British during the Revolutionary War were cowards?

We'd all be eating fish n' chips using our bad teeth to chomp upon as we watch endless non-NFL 'football'

Talk about depressing!
So we spit on people like the guy in that film..

Yes he saved others' lives and won medals for it, but you don't take such rigid principles like that into war just like if you believe strongly in waiting until marriage to have sex, you don't actively seek to work in a brothel or a porn shoot.

Just absolutely sick n' tired of these bullshit anti-war films..

The utter preachiness!  Gawd..
And its not just war films.

The entire entertainment community seems to look down upon the rest of America (even the smug liberals) as nothing more than fucking morons & imbeciles with heads full of bread dough to be shaped and molded to their worldview

It is Hollywood's job to entertain.. That's it..

Tell their little stories.. Make us laugh or cry or gasp and leave the thinking and postulating about how we each see the world to our own devices..

But they can't..  Especially at Oscar time..
The films that get the awards are the ones no one wishes to see and the films everyone watches again n' again are ignored as idiocy for the masses

Meanwhile the mantra of Hollywood now into Sunday and beyond which all are to blindly accept is as follows:

'War is Bad.. Globalism is Good.. Islam is Peace.. Blacks are Victims..  Conservative whites are the Devil.. Trump is Shit'

OK Hollywood..  Got it..    Now shoo dirty fly, shoo..

Wednesday, February 22, 2017

This Day in History: Honoring Washington's Birthday

We were looking at historical events which occurred today, February 22nd and a couple things struck us..

First, that this has not been a kind day to Jewish people..

On February 22nd, 1349, they were expelled from Zurich, Switzerland, in 1775 they were expelled from Warsaw, Poland and in 1941 the evil Nazis started rounding them up in Amsterdam, Holland.

Add to that a bomb attack in Jerusalem by Muslim Arabs in 1948 that killed 50 (Arab Muslims.. Terrorists?  Noo...!) and it would be understandable if any Jewish person did not wish to celebrate today..
Secondly, today is the official birthday of the Republican Party - its first ever National meeting was in Pittsburgh in 1856.  The party was formally called the Whigs but continual political defeat along with fractures in that party over slavery caused it to dissolve in 1852.

Over the last 161 years, there have been 19 Republican Presidents counting Trump..  In the same span, there have been 12 Democrats though to be fair, FDR did serve for 4 terms with of course Truman becoming President in 1945 to finish the 4th term when FDR died..

But of course the most important event that Americans should care about is today is Washington's birthday..
He used to have a official 'day' to himself but because political correctness felt the need to put Martin Luther King Jr on the same level of respect as someone Actually great and who did Far more for the nation than that other..

Well, the guy with dreams who provoked violence and confrontation in the South to get his way got his 'day' to be a government holiday while Washington, one of if not The most Important Americans ever, was shoved in with a bunch of others ranked from good to garbage in what we call 'Presidents' Day'
Wonder what Washington would think of the nation today beyond amazement at the technological advancements and the physical size and scope of the country..

Honestly we can't see Washington being all that happy..

Maybe its a 1700's thing but we just see him being more sickened then pleased..

Washington always believed America should worry about itself and not concern itself with the affairs of other nations when it did not directly pertain to us..

So we don't think he'd be all that keen seeing that the President is now regarded as the most powerful man in the free world and worrying about the rots of the peoples of the globe..
Obviously the black situation would make him disgusted and we can bet the moment he found out gay pretend-marriage was valid in the eyes of the law, Washington would probably instantly throw up..

Not sure what Washington's feelings were on illegal immigration but we can't imagine he would be happy to welcome violent, hate filled people from backwards civilizations that believe in a cult-faith that is 800 years behind the times

And we can't imagine he being too pleased that his beloved home Mt Vernon was now a tourist attraction where tour guides distort and alter its history in their presentations as to be politically correct and sensitive to descendants of slaves
Also wonder how Washington would feel knowing the nation that caused the deaths of thousands of troops that served under him was now our closest political ally

Maybe he'd take some comfort that the US is the Superior in the 'Special' relationship

Bet he'd also be amazed that France, once among the greatest nations in the world is now pretty much 2nd tier, at least militarily
Life, perceptions and attitudes sure change over time don't they..

Popular views of the day that the vast majority believed suddenly becomes 'incorrect' or 'racist' later in time..  Allies become enemies..  Enemies become friends..

Just think.. A couple hundred years from now, people could look at the period we live in today and think 'Amazing how much of complete Worthless Idiots those Democrats were - no wonder the Party collapsed and dissolved!' as Trump is possibly looked upon in the future as among the greatest Presidents ever

Maybe in two centuries blacks will officially take over the world and subjugate 'whitey' just like the Caucasian race-guilters and the militant BLM garbage dream..

Or maybe 2217 will be like it was in 1807..  Who knows..
It's all a pendulum really..  That's what history is..

The technology, clothing and hairstyles change but not much else..

We would like to think that even though Washington would look at 2017 America and the modern political/social mindsets of at least 50% of the nation with complete revulsion (psst, they're called liberals), that he still would not regret the sacrifices he made as General then President to ensure we had a nation which would flourish and grow...
So we honor George Washington on his birthday..

He was a man far Superior and Important to this nation Dr King or any other Black History figure shoved down our throats during this month ever was or could be..

A man deserving once more of his own special government observed holiday

Hopefully in the future, the situation among the two will be properly rectified.